Today I want to talk about Georgist Tax Structure as well as a worthwhile gallery show at the Community Design Center, diagrammatic case studies of sustainable urbanism.
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjtZkCF18yuaSz39eD1b3WWd4qt0ZR9Od_cSC8o3NccRX61Cjs9ZaWZvvOsP5O_v4Zrlu72kUU18kI2TbFaL4qy-O5j0f6Ly-7N15b7KBkwYCh2KDkeB0__u0S7xcp2lY7Ib06cpTH5p1w/s200/7641-news1_kramer_21109.jpg)
The idea behind the alternative, Henry George's Land-Value Taxation, is that the tax burden on owners of undeveloped downtown real estate would provide incentive to either develop a revenue generating use for the property, or sell to those who would be willing to better utilize it. True land-value taxation implies that only the land is taxed, regardless of improvements. The Pennsylvania model is a split-rate partial Georgist model in that land in the most valuable areas of the city is taxed at a higher rate than the improvements (building). Taxation done in this manner has the added benefit of discouraging sprawl as studies have shown that higher land value taxation leads to increased construction in that jurisdiction.
According to the following story, Rochester City Council has invited advocates of Georgist Tax, which I first read about in James Howard Kunstler's Home from Nowhere, to present the virtues in April. I'm not sure what it would take to adopt such a scheme in New York. In Maryland in 1898, a challenge by the town of Hyattsville was deemed unconstitutional. Eventually an amendment was added to the state constitution in 1916, but I am unable to tell whether any Maryland municipalities are taking advantage of this legality.
by Tim Louis Macaluso, City Newspaper
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjU5JVo1_adR7qE156Oy90nuCkwki1eiu5Rd7UrgY2UJ8b8QcmZJJcLUa29n4cgockHoJjMWqHgU4LdXMfzD-gq38gGt5WtB724540A1jSDeAz1_FNnJ1rMUGk6BkpR0y0TOEYSWvrkpio/s200/gallery_hh_large.gif)
No comments:
Post a Comment